What kind of morality should logically follow from Darwinism?
According to Neo-Darwinism, is there any reason to have an objective system of Morality?
A Clip taken from Ben Stein's expose of the academic censorship, persecution, and dishonesty that exists within the ranks of american academia.
Intelligent design is rejected as a starting assumption by most naturalistic and atheistic scientists, though it is itself a rigorous and thoroughly researched scientific hypothesis. The fact that it may lead to metaphysical implications, should not be taken as an excuse to dismiss it out of hand.
Besides all this, this documentary demonstrates some of the anti-scientific, mythical, and presumptive assumptions of Neo-Darwinists and Evolutionists.
- Pastor J.